Understanding the book written by Thomas Friedman titled The Lexus and the olive Tree, current relationship between globalization and internationalistic terrorism is unconstructive and rather depressing. Further more, I completely guard with Mr. Friedmans interpretation of globalization with its backlash. Maintaining our geographic, historic, spiritual and linguistic expressions of whom we belong is an net struggle against the technological revolution and modernization which globalization greatly take awayers. (Friedman, 2000) In addition, the opposed to globalization are indeed menace by their loss of power and influence over their have got valid territories. A response for such crippling factors is gener on the wholey organized international terrorism, whose leaders miserably use the godliness of Islam as a uniting cause for their fight against globalization.
Thomas Friedman defines globalization as the inexorable integration of markets, nation- verbalizes and technologies to a degree never witnessed before-in a way that is enabling individuals, corporations and nation-states to reach around the orbit farther, faster, deeper and cheaper than ever before, and in a way that is enabling the orbit to reach into individuals, corporations and nation-states farther, faster, deeper and cheaper than ever before. (Friedman, 2000, 9) Globalization is the dominant international hold upment whose main weapon is the free market capitalism; consequently it has intents of expanding the market areawide. Globalization is global because only countries feel the make of it, negative and positive, directly or indirectly. Globalization, as the enormous worldwide concept, exists thanks to the evolution of technology in our time, which is divided into computerization, miniaturization, digitization, artificial satellite communications, fiber optics and the Internet. (Friedman, 2000, 9) The democratization of communications enabled more and more quite a little to communicate and learn about each others lifestyles. This technology makes it possible to see graphic images from one end of the world to another, spread the messages and ideas through the internet and...
Dont get me wrong, I wish the essay, it was well-written and presented. besides it was biased towards favouring American policy, and that religion and nationalist countries are the cause of anti-globalist movements. How do you define anti-globalist movements? Tarrifs and trade-barrier, as correctly mentioned in the essay. But the true anti-globaliser recently seems to be the USA herself! Steel-tarrifs, farm-subsidies, all these give inefficient industries an un unobjectionable advantage, rather than letting other countries, that could provide the service much better. There is a deal out of sceptism towards globalisation in third world and USs recent moves force lead those countries to put up trade-barriers as well, and it is a graduation back! Furthermore, the Islam-religion states accept all people of all religion and live in peace. Terrorism has recently been provoked by 1. the US putting a military base downward in Saudi-Arabia without the consent of the people, and 2. Israel enslaving the Palestinian people, as they have through with(p) for the last 20 years or so, but this has been unattended by the western world. In addition when the author writes: The enlist aim of such struggle is highly present in all countries worldwide (except the States), I think there is a fair amount of examples that state the opposite. Take Bushs last election-fiasco for example.
I dont necessarily agree that the paper is all that well written--it is missing that flow that usually (dont take it personally if its not the case) means the passages presented are summarized comments (b orderlinessline plagarism if not cited) and therefore the connecting sentences between these summarized thoughts are missing. This is especially alarming when a Bibliography is so long but the actual paper contains so a few(prenominal) citings.
As far as cenzos comment: it is not that Islam is a heathen religion that causes anti-globalization, but unfortunately too legion(predicate) Middle East countries hide their true intentins and hatred for the loved devils of the West behind the religion of Islam--obviously warping the Western views of that religion. But whos to blame for that? It is human nature to fear the unknown--and Islam is a truly big unknown to the western world. Then to have it presented as the religion that the fanatical terrorists claim? They bring the heat upon themselves!
As far as Palestinians---hit the books. first, it has been over 20 years since that realm has been fighting---try since the Philistines (the forefathers of Palestine) encroached and then dominated the Israelites (who just escaped Egyptian slavery) for over 50 years starting with their victory over king Saul in 1050 BC.
Of course, the fighting hasnt been constant since then, but it is the tail end of a hatred that has existed. Further, the establishment of a Jewish state after WWII can not be blamed either--as Israel threw off the chains of the colonizing power (Britain) to finally acheive full recognition. Arafat brought his fanaticsm to the Palestinian people and has actually been the greater cause of his peoples suffering. For more history and my slimness :) read the Beyond the Storm essay posted on this site!
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment