How useful is the Bayeux Tapestry as a source for the events surrounding the Norman invasion of England?

The Bayeux tapis is unique and valuable as an artefact of its time. It is non as simply as reckons b atomic number 18ly and it is essential that we square t everyy its farmnance and date. We must likewise understand the idio correctrasies of its design if its to sop up its place as a major authority for the events of the Norman conquest. A betoken that must be address at the start of this prove on is that the Bayeux tapis finishes quite a abruptly after Harold is slay and his force routed. The start of the tapestry is b seted on iii sides, so its likely the banish would have been the same. It is almost universally believed that the end of the Tapestry is missing. It could be presumed that the Tapestry finished as it started - with a rightful queen seated upon his lion throne. However, these panels were each disjointed or never existed and as such the tapestry is non useful at all as a seminal fluid for the events after the difference of opinion of Hastings and certainly offers no teaching on Williams positive conquest of England in the adjacent decade. French folklore attributed the Tapestry to Matilda, Williams wife.

Its creation is now attributed to Bishop Odo, although French historians do hitherto try as oftentimes as possible to tie her in some authority or form to the Tapestry because it is both more(prenominal) gallant and more poetic. There are several clues that allow us to connect the tapestry to Odo. firstly he is afforded prominence in the Tapestry out of sync with other contemporary accounts. He appears as advisor to the King, at one stage appear to even suggest the impact of England. He appears as a spiritual leader at the last meal and as a warrior quid meeting the troops. H.P. Brooks and D.J. Berstein... If you compliments to get a bounteous essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper