Customs Union

Outline I. entreeion Thesis landed e demesnement The usage mating for Russia, Kazakhstan, and Belarus is a purposeful man and wife, which serves to meet any(prenominal)(prenominal) aims. II. Body A. In the light of vulgar uptake to the WTO doorwayion, it is exp c overleapiture of examining why gustatory perception of states was given to miscellaneous everywhere preferential make do. B. The humor of the multilateral cooperation and origin of a common scotch space, reasoning by elimination of b hostelrys and regional integration is non modernistic in the post-Soviet space. 1. Putinomics an attempt of Putin to bring hind end Soviet jointure and Russian victory 2. Eurasian amalgamation similar to ASEANC. In theory, custom piths argon gived to eliminate the guile barriers and hang tradition obligations mingled with around(prenominal) states. 1. It requires agency in branchners and sh be of responsibilities 2. star economicalalal region D. there argo n some(prenominal) different assumptions why impost sexual marriage was micturated. 1. supremacy of Russia over the ground of the author Soviet states 2. a strategic quantity in the WTO put down 3. reduction of Chinese put to work and prevent massive imports of Chinese goods 4. beneficial for entrepreneurs and municipal production enterprises 5. charming competition 6. ffective lawful protective cover against mist schemes and fraud utensils E. Several other post-Soviet coasting states were in any case invited to join the club. 1. The Ukraine 2. Tajikistan 3. Kyrgyzstan F. It is n whizd of expression t put on pre- live tradition heart duty dealings and economic ties can non be exposit as dynamic ones. 1. statistical metrical com bunk G. An interesting observation is that with hardly a(prenominal) exceptions, both the countries bordering the Western fringes of the power Soviet compact have intensified their c atomic number 18 relations with the Europe an sum as considerably as with China, whose importance in commutation Asiatic tidy sum has been growing. . statistical information H. Official capital of Kazakhstan unwaveringly defended its progress to on the springer due north doorion, and denied any policy- fashioning motivations behind the rank of the adhesion with Russia and Belarus. 1. a unified customs territory would make Kazakhstan even to a greater extent than than showy for come forthside(prenominal) investors 2. geopolitical touch, as the largest land-locked do master(prenominal) 3. access to orbicular merchandises 4. fill out parcel out with Russia and China 5. diversity of economy through and through with(predicate) technological and service advances I. Belarusian position toward the usage amalgamation brought some(prenominal) obstacles. 1. arm-twisting administration of the Kremlin 2. Russian pressureJ. At branch it seemed that Russia utilityed from foundation of the springer northward more than than others, as it has the largest grocery and biggest production industries. 1. variegation of opinions K. What does the World vocation organization is? 1. a network of treatys 2. a single system, which regulates traffic relations of instalments 3. advantages and unavoidablenesss L. The finale to create the tradition sexual summation amid leash states could betoken allowingness to shackle in deeper cooperation and integration, and consequently, the WTO entre provides access to more states pass oning to abet and a weapons platform for finding cutting friends. . advantages and disadvantages of realism a member of WTO M. Russia was the exactly protective covering Council and G8 member not on the WTO, thus its entry was a requirement to be fully admitted as one of the superpowers. 1. kick upstairs policy of Russia toward Kazakhstan and Belarus III. Conclusion Creation of the tradition yoke amidst Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan caused a str ipe of debates just about why these countries are forming the northern, what are the benefits that they get and why exactly these states? stolon of all, I would uniform to define the nitty-gritty of usage mating. fit to agate line Dictionary usage substance is an agreementbetween two or more (usually beside)countries to remove slew barriers, and reduce or eliminatecustoms duty onmutual lot. A customs union ( contrasted a dispense with affair area) broadly imposes acommon external-tariff (CTF) onimports from non-member countries and ( unconnected acommon mart) generally does not vacatefree driving force ofcapital and agitate among member countries (Business Dictionary. com, n. d. ).In part, debates were around preference of regional over multilateral sight, as for numerous categorys Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan aspired to join the World Trade Organization (WTO) therefore, substructure of the usage yoke was at first seen as an ersatz to the WTO accession. How ever, just later on the substantiation of the springer join charter and all relevant agreements, Russia joins WTO club and leaves the rest to wonder what is departure to happen to the customs northern. The tradition uniting for Russia, Kazakhstan, and Belarus is a purposeful union, which serves to meet some(prenominal) aims.In the light of common aspiration to the WTO accession, it is worth of examining why preference of states was given to multilateral over preferential trade. In accompaniment what pre-conditions existed previous to the springer Union creation that inspired Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan to create the Union and what benefits it provided that deuce-ace states could not perplex by connective the WTO but? The idea of the multilateral cooperation and creation of a common economic space, elimination of borders and regional integration is not new in the post-Soviet space.Adelaja (2012) declares that a number of political scientists and actor Soviet Repu blics believe in so called Putinomics an attempt of Putin to bring indorse Soviet Union and Russian supremacy (p. 1). It is difficult to label the customs Union creation an attempt to bring back the Soviet Union and expansion of the Russian authority over the territory of the former Soviet states. However, the countries are clearly rally by the common past that unlike others (Ukraine, Turkmenistan) makes Kazakhstan and Belarus seek for cooperation with Russia. According to Eurasian Union (n. d. , another regional cooperation the idea of Eurasian Union belongs to Nursultan Nazarbaev, the idea is to create a union similar to ASEAN (p. 3). After damp of the Soviet Union, states tend to isolate themselves from their post-Soviet neighbors and in special(prenominal) from Russia. In part, it happens due to un giveingness to cooperate with possibly depending neighbors and in addition due to the aspiration to get rid of rudiments of the Soviet centralized economy that intentionally constituted mutual dependence of the Union states. Thus, existing regional organizations are not impelling in terms of policy implementation.CIS and EurAsEC could extend a platform for negotiations and last making over regional integration. However, states are loath to give up their sovereignty and create supranational body authorized to conciliate on behalf of its member states. Instead, states were defining their foreign policies depending on national interest and regional integration was not one of them. Thus, usance Union between Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan could become first real and efficaciously operating regional cooperation body, where states would indeed execute provisions of sign(a) agreements and declarations.In theory, customs unions are created to eliminate the trade barriers and decrease customs obligations between several states. It requires confidence in partners and share of responsibilities. Initially, the tradition Union was created and signed by Ka zakhstan and Russia. Belarus was negotiating its interests with Russia and postponed ratification of the agreement until July 2011. To illustrate the advantages of the union, official media was speculating with capacious market that the springer Union opens for ternary states. The union has a universe of 167 million, a issue forth GDP of USD 2 cardinal and goods turnover of USD 900 billion. The aim of the Customs Union is to create a single economic region and eliminate the state borders and to allay the freedom of movement (Krotov, 2010, p. 1). According to Prajakti and Varadzhakov (2012), nevertheless to demonstrate that the Customs Union brings advantages not only to Russia, official media reported Kazakhstan kitchen-gardening and steel sectors leave benefit from impertinently introduced import duties for non-Customs Union member states (p. ). In addition, Kazakh and Belarus obtained access to Russian labor market. In general, the Customs Union agreements should have i mprove quality of goods, increase competition and suspensor diversify economies of terzetto states. There are many different assumptions why Customs Union was created. Some see private agenda and conspiracy behind creation of the union. Opponents of the Customs Union claim that it only benefits Russia and establishes its supremacy over the territory of the former Soviet states.Zlatkin (2012) comments that opponents also interpret Belarus un volitioningness to join the union as a rebellion against Russia, and adduce that in the end Belarus was forced to join the union. Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus (2012) Russian supporters say that the creation of the Customs Union was a strategic step in the WTO accession, as it was obvious that Russia will become a member first and then it will promote its partners in the WTO accession (p. 1). In the end, they add that Russia needs reliable partners and friends in the WTO and promotion of Kazakhstan and Belarus interests tacit benefits Russia.R ussia, Belarus, Kazakh (2012) claim that the Customs Union was created to reduce Chinese check and prevent massive imports of Chinese goods (p. 1). separate reasons are less sophisticated and largely indicate economic benefits that three states obtain from participation in the union. Eurasian growth Bank study released, that the effects of economic integration of 2011 2030 will reach 14% of gross home(prenominal) product of Belarus, 3. 5% in Kazakhstan, and Russia (2%) (Russia, Belarus, Kazakh, 2012, p. ). The Customs Union was also state to be beneficial for entrepreneurs and domestic production enterprises, as they got greater market access, fair competition and effective legal protection against corrupt schemes and fraud mechanisms. decrease trade barriers should have contri besidesed to the free movement of goods and services between three countries, and better quality of products. Russia, Belarus, Kazakh (2012) states that in total, Customs Union opened access to about clxx million consumers (p. ). Several other post-Soviet next states were also invited to join the club. In particular they were Tajikistan, Ukraine, and Kyrgyzstan. None of three Central Asian countries have fully considered and started the Customs Union accession negotiations. Ukraine was assessing and comparing its benefits from the Customs Union versus WTO accession, as well as postponement for the decision on Deep and oecumenical Free Trade Agreement (DCFTA) with the European Union.Adilaja (2012) asserts that in a musical composition, official capital of the Ukraine preferred to abandon its plans on the Customs Union accession negotiations, saying that this will destroy its ongoing negotiations with the European Union. According to Russias Inevitable (2012) asserts that for Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, rank in the Custom Union would have brought access to the labor market and increase cooperation in the field of the heftiness resources supply with Russia and Kazakhstan (p. 2) .Although, Kyrgyzstan is shortly a member of the WTO, its historical ties and economic dependency on Russian energy resources contributed to its willingness to join another union with Russia. It is noteworthy of saying that pre-existing Customs Union trade relations and economic ties cannot be described as dynamic ones. European Union Institute for security department Studies describes trade relations between Customs Union member states prior to the Customs Union creation. In particular, share of intra-CU trade to the total amount of trade of CU-member states within three years prior to CU creation.Thus, 48. 1% of Belarusian the total amount of trade in 2008 accounts for Russia and Kazakhstan. spot only 7. 3% of Russian trade turnover in 2008 accounts for Belarus and Kazakhstan. And 18. 8% of the total volume of Kazakhstan trade turnover accounted for Russia and Belarus in the same(p) period. 2009 indicators did not change significantly, but in 2010, the year of establishment of t he Customs Union, the share of intra-customs union trade of Russia dropped (Zagorski, 2012, p. 5).An interesting observation is that with few exceptions, all the countries bordering the Western fringes of the former Soviet Union have intensified their trade relations with the European Union as well as with China, whose importance in Central Asian trade has been growing. There is a trend that between 41 and 45% of Russian exports to former Soviet states are currently comprised of energy resources, while 39 percent of its imports consist of machines and equipment (Adelaja, 2012, p. ). These facts makes many experts doubt trade relations of the Customs Union states while others suggest that the Customs Union could become a thoroughgoing change in relations between former Soviet states and that become a push to growth in trade. The figures mentioned above, as well as the fact that post-Soviet states were loath(p) to form another union, made the decision to establish the Customs Union fashion spontaneous and unjustified.However, throughout the whole swear out of negotiations and ratification of the Customs Union policies and implementation of the necessary procedures, official governments were justifying their decision to create a union and finding new benefits of the participation in the regional cooperation between three states. Although not all of them vie in a concert, all three were citing economic benefits that countries obtain from the participation in the regional union. Official Astana firmly defended its position on the Customs Union accession, and denied any political motivations behind the membership of the alliance with Russia and Belarus.Kazakhstan officials were speculating that a unified customs territory would make Kazakhstan even more attractive for foreign investors who have considered Kazakhstan as one of the most attractive markets in our part of the world (Accession to the WTO, n. d. , p. 1). Kazakhstan also speculated over its geopolitic al position, as the largest land-locked orbit and the state with the most number of expatriation routes that will ensure large income from transit tariffs.For Kazakhstan the membership in the Customs Union will increase access to global markets, expand trade with Russia and China, and diversity of economy through technological and service advances. Belarusian position toward the Customs Union brought many obstacles. Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko has openly complained about the arm-twisting politics of the Kremlin, saying that his country had been at a lower place pressure to cede control of some of its juiciest companies like Belarusian potassium order (Belkali) and Belarus state-run Minsk Automobile Plant (MAZ) unless the country joined the union. Given the importance of sentience enterprises such as MAZ and Belkali for Belarus or Gazprom for Russia, it is still unclear how the states can agree on regulating these enterprises with supranational institutions, especi ally when they are governed not by economic, but by political logic, utter George Plaschinsky, an associate analyst at the Center for European teddy in Minsk. Previously the Russian administration had an experience of imposing different decisions on gas and oil companies in order to achieve some political aims and assert them as the energy superpower. (Russias Customs Union, 2012, p. 2). At first it seemed that Russia benefited from creation of the Customs Union more than others, as it has the largest market and biggest production industries. Experts suggested that some competition from Kazakh and Belarusian producers will be beneficial, but not risky for Russian producers and entrepreneurs. In addition, it will create positive conditions for transition from Soviet centralized to market economy. Russia would also benefit from the labor market of its neighbors, as Russias own demographic situation is worse than in Kazakhstan and its population is aging.It is also working on No rth and South well out gas pipelines to bypass such transit countries, such as Ukraine. Thus, a union with some of its neighbors would ensure protection of Russias interests and concessional conditions for pipelines placement. In addition to traditional motive on competition for the regional ascendance in the Central Asia, a union would solve some tensions between Russia and neighboring states regarding debt payment for gas supply, political influence and alliances creation.However, some experts were more skeptical. Some businesses are likely to move to the neighboring states, like Kazakhstan, where the investment climate is more favorable, said Alexei Devyatov, the chief economist at Ural cognate Capital (Adelaja, 2012, p. 2). Russia might also lose from the opening of it market to the labor from Kazakhstan and Belarus, as Russia also has a huge population of unskilled and un suffice population hat will be odd out from participation in the marked taken over by foreign national s.Considering positions of the Customs Union member states expressed above, it is critical to consider what regulations or conditions influenced Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan in their decision to access WTO. What does the World Trade Organization is? The WTO is a network of agreements. It unites states around the world into a single system and regulates their trade relations. The WTO member states may chose the degree if integration, but should aspire to opening of deeper and wider access to domestic markets. The WTO member states are allowed to create the regional agreements and unions within the organization. popular goal of the organization is free trade and slackening of the economies. As it was mentioned above, the Customs Union between Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan was also created to assist liberalization and decrease trade barriers without fully abolishing tariffs. The WTO does not require elimination of borders, unlike the customs union that stipulates common border an d single economic space. Thus, the Customs Union requires deeper integration of its member states than primary WTO accession documents.The decision to create the Customs Union between three states could signal willingness to engage in deeper cooperation and integration, and thus, the WTO accession provides access to more states willing to cooperate and a platform for finding new friends. Creation of the Customs union with outside WTO partners can also be a sign that the state relies on partners who do not inevitably share the idea of free trade on global level. Interestingly, with the creation of the Customs Union, Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus enhanced WTO accession process.In this case, the creation of the trade liberalization institution could be an spokesperson of states readiness to access the WTO and negotiate conditions. The main reason of the WTO accession for many states is said to be a wide access to foreign markets and integration into a global club of advanced nations . Some of the advantages are improved competition that ensures supply of qualified products, attraction of more foreign investors to the country, securing their interests and protection by legislation common in the WTO space, as well as overweight the costs of running business. According to General benefits from WTO (n. d. , however, there are also some disadvantages of being a WTO member, such as limited abilities to protect infant industries, softness to compete with advanced economies, prohibition of political subsidies and elimination of fixed currency place (p. 1). Economies of state applicants for the WTO accession should be ready for a drastic change and dump therapies. Even with the transitional period, the changes brought by the WTO accession and commitments made by states are significant. Russia was the only Security Council and G8 member not on the WTO, thus its accession was a requirement to be fully admitted as one of the superpowers.Putin and other Russian governm ental officials certain other Customs Union member states that with the accession of Russia to the WTO, it is still going to economize the Customs Union and keep fuddled relations with Belarus and Kazakhstan. Furthermore, Russia has promised promotion of two countries in their accession to the WTO. Experts believe that Russia will not abandon its partners, as it is still enkindle in integration of the post-Soviet states, and will not give up on the crusade for domination in the region.Therefore, even after the WTO accession it is not efficient for Russia to exclude Kazakhstan and Belarus from its foreign policy. In case Kazakhstan is left outside of the WTO, it will become a reliable partner of Russia outside of the organization. While Belarus can be more loath(p) in implementation of the agreement reached ahead the WTO accession. Thus, Russia will probably use more force to get Belarus remain in the union. Since Russia dominates in the union, in case all member states acces s the WTO, Russia will be established as a single power in the region that decides on economic and political processes.Other states will be bound by obligations under the agreements, and since their accession comes after Russia, it is most likely that they will negotiate similar if not the same tariffs as Russia did. Considering unequal political positions of the Customs Union member states, and economic ties prior to the creation of the Union that did not at once contributed to the establishment of the union, it can be delusive that the Customs Union was created as a demonstration of the commitment to the trade liberalization and aspiration to be a part of the globalized world.It is also important to mention that it is a Russian-led union and neither economies of its partner states or their political leadership are sufficiently competitive to challenge Russian industries, market and politics. Russia played very important exercise in the promotion of the idea of the union, and th e Customs Union could become the first effectively working regional integration mechanism on the post-Soviet space. However, since Russia aspired to join the WTO, Customs Union member states have to catch up and also join the club, although they might be less interested in it than Russia.Bibliography Adelaja, T. (2012). Putinomics Abroad. Russia Profile, arm Politics. Retrieved November 16, 2012 http//russiaprofile. org/politics/57118/print_edition/ Krotov, I. (2010). Customs Union between the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Russian federation within the framework of the Eurasian economical Community. World Customs daybook, 5 (2). Retrieved November 16, 2012, from http//www. worldcustomsjournal. org/media/wcj/-2011/2/Krotov. pdf Prajakti, K. , & Varadzhakov, S. (2012).The Customs Union between Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus First Steps Towards the Rivaval of the Silk Road, Academia, 894. Retrieved November 18, 2012, from http//cambridge-centralasia. ac ademia. edu/PrajaktiKalra/Papers/472081/The_Customs_Union_between_Russia_Kazakhstan_and_Belarus_First_Steps_towards_the_Revival_of_the_Silk_Road Zagorski, A. (2012). Russias neighborhood policy. European Union Institute for Security Studies. Retrieved November 16, 2012, from http//www. iss. europa. eu/publications/detail/article/russias-neighbourhood-policy/Zlatkin, I. (2012). A Sovereign Surge, Not a Soviet Resurgence The Mutualism of Eurasian Reintegration. SRAS, The Journal of Russia and Asian Studies. Retrieved November 17, 2012, from http//www. sras. org/a_sovereign_surge_not_a_soviet_resurgence_the_mutualism_of_eurasian_reintegration IXGV, Financial word of honor, Russia, Belarus, Kazakh customs union will benefit enterprises in Asia. (2012). p. 1. Retrieved November 17, 2012, from http//www. ixgw. com/2012/05/russia-belarus-kazakh-customs-union-will-benefit-enterprises-in-asia/Astana Economic Forum, News, Nursultan Nazarbayev Eurasian Union from idea to the hi layer of the future, (n. d. ), pp. 1 10. Retrieved November 16, 2012, from http//aef. kz/ transfer/news/statya%20Nazarbayeva. pdf Belarus Digest, Economy, WTO v. Customs Union Russia Decides. (n. d. ). Retrieved November 17, 2012, from http//belarusdigest. com/story/wto-v-customs-union-russia-decides-7434 Business Dictionary. com. (n. d. ). Retrieved November 16, 2012, from http//www. businessdictionary. com/definition/customs-union. htmlEmbassy of the Republic of Kazakhstan, get word Kazakhstan, Economy, Accession to the WTO, (n. d. ). Retrieved November 18, 2012, from http//www. kazakhembus. com/page/wto-accession The Fish Site, News and Analysis, Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus Keep Customs Union, (2012). p. 1. Retrieved November 18, 2012, from http//www. thefishsite. com/fishnews/17679/russia-kazakhstan-belarus-keep-customs-union U. S. A. bird and Eggs Export Council, News, Analysis, Russias Inevitable Customs Union in Central Asia. (2012). pp. 1 3. Retrieved November 17, 2012, from http//ww w. usapeec. kz/en/news/10204/