Heinz Kohuts Theories and Practice

Heinz Kohuts Theories and PracticeHeinz Kohut The Man and His WorkAlthough not as sanitary known as his contemporary Sigmund Freud, Heinz Kohut is equ all(prenominal)y famous among his peers for his exploration of conceit and the lymph glands need for empathy and on a lower floorstanding from his or her healer. The aim of this composition is to describe the possibleness and practice of Heinz Kohut and his influence over the authors practice, both describing the psychological mechanisms that drove Kohut to this line of thinking a recollective with design vignettes of the authors own psychobiography that led her to include some of his theory into her work with customers.Usually, far much is known or so a analysts work than about his life or psychea. Scholars name erect it useful to examine the life of a theorist to gain discernment into how he may buzz off come to the conclusions he had, especially as there is currently no grand unified theory of therapy. In wiz of Kohu ts biographies, Siegel (1996) described him as a walking contradiction that has more than a healthy dose of amour propre.Kohut seemed a strange pastiche of aloof, aristocratic and almost puritanical austerity in a heartily responsive and considerate person. He was a very private person and was careful how he let himself-importance appear in public. I never saw him sloppily dressed and I know that he right and edited his writings again and again before he was satisfy to release them for publication. He was properly discreet about his health and a few(prenominal) of his friends knew that during the last decade of his life he was suffering from a chronic leukaemia in remission. Long before the contemporary popularity of exercise and jogging, Kohut ran, not jogged, his appointive miles several times a week. He ate sparingly to take note a trim figure.Another biographer described him as some integrity with a profound zest for life that frequently enraged people or hurt them ba dly with his intense amour propre (Strozier 2004, p. 12). Perhaps he discover these traits quite an strongly in himself which is why he became fixated on creating a theory of go againstment with narcissism at the core. As a perfectionist, he carefully controlled how others would perceive himself as Siegel renderd above. This fastidiousness may have originate in from his personal history. As the pincer of two German Jews living under the sword of Damocles that was Adolf Hitler, and the German Imperium of the primaeval twentieth century, the family had to assimilate as take up as they possibly could into the society. Europe had long been hostile toward the Jewish Diaspora and conformity was a matter of life and death. Thus, there is a need to develop two selves the public self and the private self. According to Stroziers biography, in addition to his legal fix, he also had a decompose name to be used inside the confines of his religious association (2004).His come along study of the information of narcissism originated in the wholesale rejection of the academic community when he sought to begin his didactic analysis, in order to ultimately become a psychoanalyst. The committee cited his narcissism as a legal profession to entry but his biographer noted that there were several narcissistic psychoanalysts in the 1940s and suggested that his rejection may have been linked to his rather unorthodox sexual practices (Strozier 2004).In the time that he flourished, he and a few of his contemporaries placed a strong emphasis on the importance of the therapists relationship with the client. First is the premise of non-defensiveness. The adoption of an open lastingness en fits the clients to open up and declare freely without fear of mankind jilted or humiliated, even if the client should express reservations about the therapist herself (Kahn 1997). Although this is super difficult to achieve in practice because therapists, ilk the general populat ion, have sore spots and strong value systems that they usually defend quite vigorously. However, once the therapist learns non-defensiveness, the client would feel comfortable speaking about any issue because she feels that her therapist would unconditionally support her. In early psychoanalysis, taking such a humanistic stance was seen as a bold move as psychoanalysts were careful to cultivate a detached, data-based roleensuring a noticeable emotional distance between therapist and patient. Especially obvious, was the notion of authoritythat because the therapist was the expert, his interpretation (as most psychoanalysts at the time were male) was unquestionably correct in the mind of the patient. Kohut fell into the restrain himself until he finally stop and listened to an especially difficult client. In his notes, he writesI was inclined to argue with the patient about the correctness of my interpretations and to doubt the presence of stubborn hidden resistancesFor a long ti me I insisted that the patients reproaches related to specific transference fantasies and wishes on the Oedipal directShe became even more violently angry, and furiously accused me of undermining herandwrecking her analysis (Kohut qt. Kahn 1997, p. 89).As it turned out, those so-called resistances were his clients attempts to communicate the reality of her childhood and being constantly misundersas fountainheadd and ignored. This breakthrough could not have come until Kohut stopped offering interpretations and started to truly hear where she was coming from. While this was one of his more important breakthroughs in the practice of modern therapy, his theory of on the development of the self had drawn many admirers and critics, as he views the development of narcissism with the growth of the self as one-and-the-same. However, a healthy smell of self-love is necessary to flourish, many psychologists and lay-people view narcissism as a diseased elevation of the self at the expense o f others at worst, or at best a defence-mechanism against low-self esteem.On Self-PsychologyAccording to Kohut, the grandiose self is the childs second attempt to regain the lost blissful state by creating a sense of perfection within the self. In this effort, all imperfection is assigned to the world outside (Siegel 1996, p. 86). For a childs psyche, this is a survival mechanism as acknowledging imperfection or flaws within the self causes tremendous amount of psychic pain. This was especially true for one of my clients. Over time, we discovered that she could only feel worthy of respect by contriveing this grandiose self-image of success and invincibilitynot because she needfully believes she is superior to others, but because she fears rejection by her peers and contempt from her subordinates should people discover who she truly was. According to Kohut, clinging to the grandiose self usually happens if a childs primary caretaker is not very empathic or the child has been undet ermined trauma at this time (Siegel 2006). Part of her therapy includes discovering who this self is. Because she had constructed several layers of off identity, she does not know who she is, as her self-concept was buried in shame, humiliation, and neglect. Most of the patients in the authors work have exhibited signs of an injured grandiose self, which necessitated a heavy emphasis on empathy and a mirror-transference over the argumentation of treatment.Applying the Theory A Case StudyFor the sake of privacy, no ones name would be released, so this paper will summon to the authors client as Nadia. She had been in therapy for several weeks because she had see a series of unfortunate events, which made her reflect further upon her life. Her relationships have unhealthy patterns where a suitor would appear to put her on a pedestal during the courtship phase and then when things became settled, she would break off the relationship in search of the next man that would make her feel as special. She has lapsed into a deep depression because her life had taken a course other than what she had envisioned her destiny would entail with respect to her rush and acquiring certain status symbols (i.e. house and nice car). She withdrew from family and friends not able to face the humiliation that comes with lifes setbacks, partially because she would always speak of how wonderful her life was. Meeting her own expectations and those of her family had become a obsession as it served to formalise her existence and her superiority over others that were somewhat slight driven.The authors role in the interaction is small, but fundamental. With patients such as Nadia, it is just necessary to listen and establish a sense of twinshipthat is, cultivate the feeling that she and I are very connatural, having very similar expectations of life. Initially, those seeking therapy are searching for somebody to validate them and human temper being what it is, they will not feel unde rstood by someone that seems drastically different confiding in those that are most like themselves, but this tendency is even more pronounced in the narcissist. The client must(prenominal) feel that it is all right to share her feelings because she is certain that they would be understood unconditionally. According to Kohut, in the mirror/alter-ego transference The patient experiences you as like himself his thoughts seem to be present in you also, and whats passing on in him he feels is going on in you too. When he feels distant, you are distant from him too. When he is enraged, he feels you are enraged too (Kohut, Tolpin Topin, 1996, p. 34). Intriguingly enough, narcissism often provides the patient an unparalleled degree of connectedness as she views the other as an extension of herself and loves her because she loves herself. Conversely, she may hate her therapist because she may reflect back aspects of herself that she does not like. Sometimes, when the client no bimestri al views the therapist as a mirror-object, but another person, the therapy sessions would end because she would no longer take any narcissistic pleasure in understanding herself, yet that separation may signal the beginning of deeper changes to come. According to Kohut, once the client becomes subconsciously aware that the therapist and client are two separate entities, she proceeds to narcissistic projectionwhere she projects aspects of herself unto the therapist (Kohut, Tolpin Tolpin 1996). The therapist then must work through the reasons why her client is sending forth those event emotions and then encourage her to reflect upon her emotions and the events of the past that brought them out and caused the client to project those emotions onto her, whether those emotions are positive or negative.ReflectionsTo a small extent, the therapist must attempt to keep this interest in play as long as possible for significant change to occur. That does not necessarily beggarly that a clien t will be curedin fact, a cure may not be desirable because narcissism is often necessary for life in the competitive, individualistic cultures of Western nations. This is not a rare practice for psychotherapists to control how they are perceived by their clients, as it is often necessary to project an image of competence as well as physical and mental health in order to ontogenesis credibility with them. However, there is the danger of seeming intimidating and unapproachable because clients usually cannot relate to someone that seems perfectly conscientious and undisturbed by the world at all times. They need a mirror to reflect and validate a more empowered version of their self-images. This is where empathy becomes all the more significant in practice. The therapist must always maintain her image as a competent professional, but she should be able to convey that she is suitable of putting herself into anothers situation and then helping her clients from a position of strength.B iographyGreenberg, J.R. Mitchell, S.A. (1983), Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory, Cambridge, MA Harvard University PressKahn, M. (1997), Between Therapist and Client The New Relationship. New York, NY atomic number 1 Holt Company, LLCKohut, H., Tolpin, P., Tolpin, M. (1996), Heinz Kohut The Chicago Institute Lectures, Hillsdale, NJ The Analytic PressSiegel, A.M. (1996), Heinz Kohut and the Psychology of the Self, capital of the United Kingdom RoutledgeStrozier, C.B. (2004), Heinz Kohut The Making of a Psychoanalyst, Chicago, IL Farrar, Straus Giroux, LLC